|
Author
|
Do not think it's good censor |
pusey-2
|
4 tracks
initiated
72 messages
posted
veteran |
|
|
Published
07 February de 2003 at 00:47:15  
|
About Ñanñam messages. If you noticed in this forum the "moderator" has almost no chance aperecido. In principle I do not think it was good to delete any messages. People who write nonsense does not usually last long. And on Evaristo, do not be angry with him, usually not always that tone.
In this forum I found these categories of people pro Opus:
- People who left the work and still understands (2 or 3 who has seen appear).
- People who know only superficially (because he has been a student, cooperative, chico / a de San Rafael), which also comprises: at most 5.
- People who seem to be linked to the body: about 3.
In computing the number of interventions only people who have had some continuity.
Well, the latter group, of which they are linked, is the most bigoted and irrational interventions in defense of the Work. Just knowing that everyone else lie without explaining anything.
From all this it follows that the worst defenders of the institution are precisely those who are still inside.
And paradoxical as it may, what ex-members know better highlight the positive aspects of the institution's own adherents today.
So, for my part I am against censoring anyone. I think if the purpose is to provide information, readers will have enough common sense to separate the chaff (pun intended) of wheat. |
|
| ana |
5 tracks
initiated
65 messages
posted
veteran |
|
|
Published
07 February de 2003 at 01:12:55
|
I agree that censorship is not good and that we must let each be expressed freely.
readers are those who can not read or choose from the writer. (I, for example, if I see Lunches, step length)
|
|
| cabernet |
1 tracks
initiated
55 messages
posted
veteran |
| |
|
Published
07 February de 2003 at 09:51:02
|
It is wrong to censor, except that we want to censor (it's little mess, I know, but as one said, I'm so complicated).
I mean some messages from Opus enthusiasts who want to "break" the forum or we propose to remove them, or leave it.
To those who have to censor themselves: not for his opinions (quite the contrary, their lack of opinions and dialogue) but for his destructive attitude and intention to eliminate this avenue of expression, free.
If we do not blame those who want to silence us, we will be censored. |
|
| cabernet |
1 tracks
initiated
55 messages
posted
veteran |
| |
|
Published
07 February de 2003 at 09:54:02
|
Oh, another thing. I would like to welcome yum-yum. His speeches sound like me and I agree completely, including the request to moderator to remove insults and interventions out of tune.
Oh, and I want to know how to put my photo of the military under the nick. |
|
| javier |
2 tracks
initiated
17 messages
posted
recent |
| |
|
Published
07 February de 2003 at 15:28:45
|
Pusey Hello, I totally agree with you.
Namnam, I think there are some very interesting things in your interventions, however do not worry too much about the opusinos interventions.
Greetings to all. |
|
There are 1
pages of post: 1 
Close this topic
moderated forum