Forum about Opus Dei
 
 Home
    The Opus Dei Forum
    General
        A piece of my website on the opus dei explaining some common errors
  This message has 4 replies and has been read 88 times
 Reply to this message
   
 Register on the forum
   
 
 Author
A piece of my website on the opus dei explaining some common errors
 Invitado
 44 tracks
 initiated
 377 messages
 posted
 veteran
 
 Published 03 October de 2002 at 16:32:48    

erhaps interested in this site:

www.ensilencio.3a2.com
or http://es.geocities.com/ensilencio.htm

I'm a little tired of reading nonsense and does not tolerate injustice. Saludos amigos!
 
 Invitado
 44 tracks
 initiated
 377 messages
 posted
 veteran
 
 Published 03 October de 2002 at 18:22:00    

I have read the website to which you refer, okay, and that in that article reconcozco have told many stupidities, but I believe that on some issues there is more than pink with correcting everything. I think the Opues Dei has a lot of good, but the modes are not so good, or at least some things are not done well and so she accused of being secretive, occult, and others, and if not why when someone leaves the Work nobody talks about it? And I think that in all spheres of life is normal surrender, leave something on time, and the mystery surrounding who will? I think it would be much more natural to say it like it is as if hidden, that's when it gives rise to speculations, ramble and assembled films that maybe are not true.
 
 Ulises
 4 tracks
 initiated
 106 messages
 posted
 veteran
 
 Published 04 October de 2002 at 09:28:13    

I too have begun to read the articles and commentaries to it, and I admit that I'm tired too, but most of the article with the nonsense that is said to Revat and clear intention to defend is appreciated even Opus without arguments, using all sorts of tricks.
 
 Lola2002
 12 tracks
 initiated
 179 messages
 posted
 veteran
 
 Published 04 October de 2002 at 12:55:18     

Defense is as always defending the indefensible ... ... also realized they never accept any criticism? Never going to say that they say is true, we should take this into account to improve it .... or if it is true, but such a thing ... no, never say that something is true (and there are thousands of things that are true ) ... be that Opus is just perfect to more perfect than the Church? (because even the church admits mistakes and apologizes)
Anyone ever heard of Opus apologizing for something or recognize a mistake?
(boys eye opus, it is not "some pride"?)

Lola icq: 172943141
 
 cazuelo
 4 tracks
 initiated
 64 messages
 posted
 veteran
 
 Published 04 October de 2002 at 16:00:23    

Friend "guest":
I read your article, but just between us ... You have looked easy, imp! Tip the animals from uninformed I would even say that is good because you strengthens you (hence my insistence that we not fall into nonsense or absurd exaggeration when we criticize the methods of the Work). Anyway, as I was saying. Displaying your willingness, my "guest" you would appreciate a little space devoted to
1 .- Ensure that Opus Dei and meet their tax obligations as a civil institution without cheating.

2 .- Do not coerced into anything on its members to confess to priests of "Home".

3 .- What is involved in its action as an institution of the church in pastoral work together at parishes.

4 .- Do not use the priesthood as a tool to indoctrinate their members but as a vocation open to all Catholics.

5 .- Do not just looking for proselytism, but to help every single person as Jesus Christ taught and that among those people are those who belonged to the Work to which never abandons the contrary, it gives them love and heat so it does not feel soulless at the moment of separation.

etc, etc, etc.

Please, I would like to see all these issues, and even many others on your wonderful website.
 
 
There are 1 pages of post:   1
 
 
 Reply to this message
 
 Close this topic
 
 moderated forum
 
  The Opus Dei Forum

translated from the Spanish pages for Google translator